<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>photoboxr.com blog</title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description>A place for people to read about my exploits, experience, and opinion on film and digital photography</description>
<copyright>Greg Noblin 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Today</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 16:02:00 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[First Time photoboxr...]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[I'll be adding photos soon....or you could go to:

<a href="http://richardrenshaw.com" target="_blank">Richard Renshaw's Photos...</a>]]></description>
<author>PhxChard</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:46:09 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[HOLA NENAS]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[SOY EL QUERENDONQUE BUSCAS]]></description>
<author>juan</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:18:26 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Just why this?]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[I wish my lawn mower was emo so it would cut itself.

I hurt myself, so I can feel alive.

It’s quite ironic that in life, the person that brings out the best in you and the one that makes you strong is actually your weakness..

“If I’m such and important person, why do you stutter when i ask you if you know my name?”]]></description>
<author>kim</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:47:27 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[A day in the life of my toddler]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[<b>This is typical of when I take pictures of my eldest toddler, she is fun, silly, and very happy when it comes to having pictures taken. She is only gives me a specific amount of time for me to take her pictures but she sure can ham it up and make some of the cutest pictures.</b>
<p align="center"><img src="http://photoboxr.com/ATachnakPhotography/uploads/CadiaHmmFace.jpg" width="453" height="647" /></p>

<p align="center"><img src="http://photoboxr.com/ATachnakPhotography/uploads/CadiaSillySmile.jpg" width="453" height="647" /></p>

<p align="center"><img src="http://photoboxr.com/ATachnakPhotography/uploads/CadiaUp.jpg" width="453" height="647" /></p>

<p align="center"><img src="http://photoboxr.com/ATachnakPhotography/uploads/CadiSmile.jpg" width="500" height="350.07727975270484" /></p>]]></description>
<author>ATachnakPhotography</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:39:45 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Alexis Tachnak Photography]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[Welcome to my photography blog!

I will start out by telling you a bit about myself and about my photography. 

I am a Canadian stay at home mother to 4 children (3 girls & 1 boy) and the loving wife to a wonderful husband for 2 1/2 years. As a child I always enjoyed taking pictures and capturing all the memories of family get togethers, the birth of a new baby within the family or of a dear close friend. I remember my first cheap handheld traditional 35mm film camera, and how I just snapped pictures of random things and looked forward to having them developed.

I started to seriously take a big interest in photography outside of it just being a hobby of mine nearly 2 years ago. I started experimenting within my home, but mainly using my children as my main focal subjects. I then started to think that I was pretty good at what I was doing for not having taken any courses of any kind. I have done quite a bit of reading and started to partake in friendly fun contests and also joined a few photography online communities to get feedback on my skills. 

I mainly focus on newborn, children, families and let's not forget the family pets. I have been known to take pictures of various plant life, still life and just about everything that catches my eye to make an interesting picture. I have sold 15 of my pictures to a fanstatic teacher in California who has put them up in her classroom for all to enjoy.]]></description>
<author>ATachnakPhotography</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:28:22 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Super High Res Inauguration]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[The guys over at Gigapan were on hand in Washington for the Inauguration this past week. Politics aside, these high resolution images never cease to amaze me. 

Thats a LOT of people!

Check the link below to see for yourself.


<a href="http://gigapan.org/viewGigapanFullscreen.php?auth=033ef14483ee899496648c2b4b06233c" target="_blank">here</a><p align="center"><img src="http://photoboxr.com/James/uploads/highrpb.jpg" width="500" height="211.0091743119266" /></p>]]></description>
<author>James</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:53:17 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[CES 2009 shows a 2TB SD Card]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[Below is the official press release for a 2TB SD flash memory card. I knew this was coming but not this soon, wow!

PRESS RELEASE

DXC SIGNALS NEW GENERATION OF REMOVABLE MEMORY
WITH UP TO 2 TERABYTES OF STORAGE

SDXC Memory Cards Provide Consumers with Massive Storage,
Incredible Speed in Familiar, De Facto Standard


LAS VEGAS – CES Booth South 3 #31277 – Jan. 7, 2009 – The next-generation SDXC (eXtended Capacity) memory card specification, announced today at the 2009 International CES, dramatically improves consumers’ digital lifestyles by providing the portable storage and speed needed to store weeks of high-definition video, years of photo collections and months of music to mobile phones, cameras and camcorders, and other consumer electronic devices. The new SDXC specification provides up to 2 terabytes storage capacity and accelerates SD interface read/write speeds to 104 megabytes per second this year, with a road map to 300 megabytes per second.

The SDXC specification, developed by the SD Association, leapfrogs memory card interface speeds while retaining the world-leading SD interface. Specifications for the open standard will be released in the first quarter of 2009. SDHC, Embedded SD and SDIO specifications will also benefit from the new SD interface speeds.

“SDXC combines a higher capacity roadmap with faster transfer speeds as a means to exploit NAND flash memory technology as a compelling choice for portable memory storage and interoperability,” said Joseph Unsworth, research director, NAND Flash Semiconductors, at Gartner. “With industry support, SDXC presents manufacturers with the opportunity to kindle consumer demand for more advanced handset features and functionality in consumer electronics behind the ubiquitous SD interface.”

Turning mobile phones into media centers
SDXC allows users to enjoy more from their mobile phones. Larger capacity and faster transfer speeds allow for expanded entertainment and data storage. A 2TB SDXC memory card can store 100 HD movies, 60 hours of HD recording or 17,000 fine-grade photos.

“With SDXC, consumers can quickly download higher quality content to their phones, including games, video and music – giving consumers a richer media and content experience,” said James Taylor, president of the SD Association. “The SD interface already has proven itself valuable in mobile phones. Now, SDXC memory card capabilities will spur further handset sophistication and boost consumer content demand.”

Shooting pictures at the speed of life
SDXC is also the first memory card specification to provide 2TB storage without hindering the high-speed performance necessary for high-end photography. It will provide maximum speeds even when the SDXC specification achieves its maximum 2TB storage capacity.

"SDXC is a large-capacity card that can store more than 4,000 RAW images, which is the uncompressed mode professionals use, and 17,000 of the fine-mode most consumers use. That capacity, combined with the exFAT file system, increases movie recording time and reduces starting time to improve photo-capturing opportunities,” said Shigeto Kanda, general manager at Canon. “Improvements in interface speed allow further increases in continuous shooting speed and higher resolution movie recordings. As a memory card well suited to small-sized user-friendly digital cameras, the SDXC specification will help consumers realize the full potential of our cameras."

SDXC will enable camcorders to provide longer, professional level HD video recording with a small form factor.

The SDXC specification uses Microsoft’s exFAT file system to support its large capacity and interoperability in a broad range of PCs, consumer electronics and mobile phones. The exFAT system was designed for increased compatibility with flash media, from portability of data to interoperability with multiple platforms and devices on removable media.

“The SD Association is committed to answering and anticipating consumer demand for easy-to-use memory card storage that is interoperable in any device with a matching SD slot,” Taylor said. “The SDXC card gives consumers a new, yet familiar, high-performance card that will be used in hundreds of manufacturers’ device offerings.”

SD Association
The SD Association is a global ecosystem of more than 1,100 technology companies charged with setting interoperable SD standards. The association encourages the development of consumer electronic, wireless communication, digital imaging and networking products that utilize market-leading SD technology. The SD standard is the number one choice for consumers and has earned nearly 80 percent of the memory card market with its reliable interoperability and its easy-to-use format. Today, mobile phones, Blu-ray players, HDTVs, audio players, automotive multimedia systems, handheld PCs, cameras and camcorders feature SD interoperability. For more information about SDA or to join, please visit the association’s web site,<a href="http://www.sdcard.org" target="_blank">www.sdcard.org</a>]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:51:26 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[GeoTagging Photos and Hacking your old Canon P&S]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[I'm a tech Geek, I admit it. I watch and listen to hours of podcasts every week. Some of my favorite shows are from a site called Revision3.com.  There are two episodes I think photographers may find interesting. First up is <a href="http://revision3.com/tekzilla/powerlinenetwork/" target="_blank">Tekzilla's</a> latest show where they talk about the best ways to GeoTag your photos.  Next up is <a href="http://revision3.com/systm/cameraOS/" target="_blank">Systm (episode 83)</a>. Systm is a DIY "How-to" podcast and in this episode they show how to hack the OS of your Canon point and shoot cameras to alter settings you normally could not, such as iso, shutter speeds, etc. Be sure to check these out!]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:30:26 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[The New Year, and something funny.]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[Happy New Year! I hope everyone has some new ideas or projects they'll be working on and to use this new year as a time to push forward and create, create, create. We will soon roll out personal blogs to anyone who wishes to become a part of the photoboxr.com community and everyday someone could have a chance to make it to the front page with their post and there are other things about to happen around here as well, so stay tuned!

More and more people are using Apple computers and in the graphics, ad, and photography business it is an absolute must! I thought I'd be a little lighthearted and share a video that I found very funny.  Enjoy!

<embed src="http://www.theonion.com/content/themes/common/assets/videoplayer2/flvplayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="always" wmode="transparent" width="400" height="355" flashvars="file=http://www.theonion.com/content/xml/92328/video&autostart=false&image=http://www.theonion.com/content/files/images/NO_KEYBOARD_article.jpg&bufferlength=3&embedded=true&title=Apple%20Introduces%20Revolutionary%20New%20Laptop%20With%20No%20Keyboard"></embed><br/><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/apple_introduces_revolutionary?utm_source=embedded_video">Apple Introduces Revolutionary New Laptop With No Keyboard</a>]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:31:02 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Ringflash Shots are FUN!]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[So the other day I was in the studio with a friend of mine, Alisha, and we played around with Profoto's Ringflash (now on sale for $700 through Mac-On-Campus' student pricing program). I got two very nice images. Both images can be seen in my <a href="http://www.photoboxr.com/blogger_gallery.php?blogger=Greg" target="_blank">gallery</a>. <p align="center"><img src="http://photoboxr.com/Greg/uploads/Alisha_Ring1.jpg" width="500" height="746.2686567164179" /></p>was the first image I worked up in Photoshop and <a href="http://www.photoboxr.com/Greg/uploads/Alisha_Ring2.jpg" target="_blank">"wink"</a> is the second. There are several more I will be fooling around with in the near future. Maybe this will inspire you to begin making images with a ringflash.

Happy Shooting!]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:40:42 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[The End Is Near, And An Era Has Come To A Close]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[This month marks the final month of production of Polaroid instant films. As photography students across the globe clamor to Ebay for 4x5 and medium format Polaroids many others are buying up the more recognizable White Bordered Polaroids that have entrenched themselves into our popular culture. Sixty years ago Polaroid began making their instamatic cameras and films and this month is the last they will ever make. <br />
<br />
Though I still have 4 boxes of B&W medium format Polaroid and 37 4x5 exposures remaining I will certainly miss the nostalgia and expediency of Polaroid. Sure, Fuji is picking up the instant film void left by Polaroid's departure, and they are even looking at making a film that allows for transfers of all types but I feel the days of SX-70 are long gone. The world of the "Alternative" process is rapidly disappearing and without the materials to teach people those processes they'll be all but forgotten in the near future.<br />
<br />
So, it seems, that digital has finally begun the end game gambit. Not many vestiges of film are left except in the realm of fine art. No longer are the learning of color correction under various lighting conditions or the use of filtration needed to darken skies, enhance greens, or whatever. As digital sensor technology skyrockets and the ability of editing software, such as Lightroom, Capture One, and Photoshop, continues to become more capable, almost anyone can color correct. <br />
The loss of Polaroid is but one milestone on the ever changing timeline of the photographic endeavor. Next will be the complete loss of film and then the final blow will come with everything being video, where large, high quality prints can be made from a single frame. The future is closer than you may know.<br />
<br />
Happy Shooting!]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:33:56 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Nikon Announces the D3x]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[* Nikon FX-format CMOS image sensor with 24.5 effective megapixels<br /><br />


    * Exceptional noise control from ISO 100 to ISO 1600<br />
<br />

    * Fast 14-bit A/D conversion incorporated onto the image sensor for high signal-to-noise ratio and low  power consumption<br />
<br />

    * Nikon’s EXPEED image-processing system, utilizing a supremely powerful CPU with 16-bit image processing<br />
<br />

    * Near-instantaneous shutter release time lag of approx. 0.04 second (based on CIPA Guideline)*<br />
<br />

    * 5-frames-per-second continuous shooting in FX format and 7 fps in DX crop mode (up to 130 frames)*<br />
<br />

    * 51-point Multi-CAM3500FX autofocus system<br />
<br />

    * Scene Recognition System for more accurate AF, AE, and AWB results<br />
<br />

    * Active D-Lighting for complete control over highlight and shadow detail<br />
<br />

    * Picture Control: Standard, Vivid, Neutral and Monochrome (Landscape, Portrait and D2x Modes I, II and III are available free via download)<br />
<br />

    * Live View mode for shooting handheld and with a tripod<br />
<br />

    * High-resolution (approx. 920k dots), 3-inch VGA-size LCD monitor with tempered glass<br />
<br />

    * Durable, lightweight magnesium-alloy construction and comprehensive weather sealing against dust and moisture<br />
<br />

    * Intelligent power management that lets you shoot up to approx. 4,400 frames on a single battery charge (based on CIPA Standards)**<br />
<br />

    * Compatibility with the Nikon Total Imaging System<br />
<br />


Effective pixels 		24.5 million
Image sensor 		<br />
CMOS sensor, 35.9 x 24.0 mm; Nikon FX format; total pixels: 25.72 million
Image size (pixels)<br />
 		FX format (36 x 24): 6,048 x 4,032 [L], 4,544 x 3,024 [M], 3,024 x 2,016 [S]
DX format (24 x 16): 3,968 x 2,640 [L], 2,976 x 1,976 [M], 1,984 x 1,320 [S]
5:4 (30 x 24): 5,056 x 4,032 [L], 3,792 x 3,024 [M], 2,528 x 2,016 [S]
Sensitivity 		ISO 100 to 1600 in steps of 1/3, 1/2, or 1 EV; can be set to approx. 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, or 1 EV (ISO 50 equivalent) below ISO 100, or to approx. 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1, or 2 EV (ISO 6400 equivalent) over ISO 1600
Storage media 		CompactFlash(Type I/II, compliant with UDMA); Microdrives
LCD monitor 		3-in., approx. 920k-dot (VGA), 170-degree wide-viewing-angle, 100% frame coverage, low-temperature polysilicon TFT LCD with brightness adjustment
Exposure metering 		TTL full-aperture exposure metering using 1,005-pixel RGB sensor
1) 3D Color Matrix Metering II (type G and D lenses); Color Matrix Metering II (other CPU lenses); Color Matrix Metering (non-CPU lenses if user provides lens data)
2) Center-weighted: Weight of 75% given to 8-, 15- or 20-mm circle in center of frame, or weighting based on average of entire frame
3) Spot: Meters 4-mm circle (about 1.5% of frame) centered on selected focus area (on center focus area when non-CPU lens is used)
Exposure modes 		1) Programmed Auto (P) with flexible program,
2) Shutter-Priority Auto (S),
3) Aperture-Priority Auto (A),
4) Manual (M)
Interface 		Hi-speed USB
Power sources 		One Rechargeable Li-ion Battery EN-EL4a/EL4, Quick Charger MH-22/MH-21, AC Adapter EH-6 (optional)
Dimensions (W x H x D) 		Approx. 159.5 x 157 x 87.5 mm (6.3 x 6.2 x 3.4 in.)
Weight 		Approx. 1,220 g (2 lb. 11 oz.) without battery, memory card, body cap or accessory shoe cover]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:13:27 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[November 13]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[So, as much of the gaming world will be running to stores for the latest World of Warcraft expansion, the rest of us will be anxious to see the official announcement from RED. This is the anticipated release/announce date for their full video 25mp DSLR. We shall see!]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:29:21 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Looks like RED is on the move.]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[So RED looks as though they are about to blow the top off of the DSLR market with t a new camera to be released early next year. The guys over at <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/09/10/more-details-on-reds-dsmc-digital-still-and-motion-camera" target="_blank">engadget</a>&nbsp; have a bit about this new RED body. <br />
<br />
This is exactly where I've said in the past about the future of photography. With Nikon's D90 and Canon's 5DMkII both having video capabilities the doors have opened for photography to transition into a more multimedia arena. And now with RED about drop a 25mp DSLR/video camera that has superior video than the Nikon and Canon cameras but can utilize lenses from both manufacturers, the future is just about here.<br />
<br />
I'm not sure how this will affect the art world, but if there is a will there is a way. I know I'd love to see or try to figure out a video encaustic process. With video screens becoming thiner and cheaper when will we be seeing video in galleries on a more traditional setting. We shall see what the future holds, that's for sure.]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:42:10 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[A Beautiful Book]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[Well, after reading Eric's post... yeah just a beautiful photo, what more should it be.... well I believe it should be meaningful, tell a story, work with other images.<br />
<br />
Here is a beautiful book shot by National Geographic photographer Jon Bowermaster called:<br />
<br /><a href="http://shop.nationalgeographic.com/product/4403.html" target="_blank">Descending the Dragon</a><br />
<br />

Sometimes the longest journey begins with great patience. When Jon Bowermaster proposed an 800-mile kayak expedition along Vietnam's northern coastline, the country's government initially responded, "That will be quite impossible." Negotiation saved the day, and Jon Bowermaster and his team of five—including a Vietnamese-American woman who had fled Saigon as a child on the final day of war in 1975—completed an unprecedented voyage, seeing Vietnam and its people in a brand new light.<br />
<br />
You can also visit NPR's (National Public Radio) site and listen to his words on this adventure...<br />
This book is about the people and the culture who live on the water in Vietnam.<br />
<br />
The interview is at the bottom of <a href="http://radiotime.com/ProgramDetails.aspx?SegmentId=31302363&ProgramId=918" target="_blank">Radio Time Roundtable</a>]]></description>
<author>Nicole</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:08:33 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Be Offensive, Be Famous]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[           Looking throughout the history of non-commercial photography, it seems as though bad publicity is much more rewarding than good publicity.  Photographers and the work they produce are constantly being critiqued.  Some get positive reviews, such as, ‘the work was elegant and thought provoking’.  Others get negative reviews like ‘the work is sacrilegious or an exploitation of some sort’.  The latter tends to come from those outside the professional artist world.  However, it seems to be the negative media hype that has launched or greatly promoted the careers of many.<br />
<br />
            Shelby Lee Adams has been and still is greatly criticized for his “documentation” of Appalachian Kentuckians.  Both locals and professional art critics despise him, yet this attention has brought great exposure to his work, making him very well known.  The same sort of story applies to Sally Mann who was constantly criticized for what many believed to be the exploitation of her children to make photographs.  These images and attention have brought her so much fame and prosperity that she was almost pigeonholed into an uncontinuable style of work.  Being arrested on suspicions of child pornography was the best thing to happen to the career of Jock Sturges.  It may not have been a great time in his life but after everything was cleared he went straight to photography stardom.  The media publicity allowed for people to view his work and get his name out there. Andres Serrano’s combination of religious iconography and bodily fluids caused quite a bit of controversy as well.  Joel Peter-Witkin and Robert Mapplethorpe have done the same thing.  They pushed the limits, or rather redefined what controversy meant, yet are now world renown for their work.<br />
<br />
            So what does that mean for upcoming photographers?  It’s probably safe to say you can’t just offend people and expect to be famous.  There are most likely a lot of other photographers to get bad reviews and not become famous.  The important thing to remember is that the previously mentioned work of these photographers, no matter how controversial or disturbing, is very thought provoking and beautiful in its own way.  They are passionate, determined, and talented.  The key point with photography is to be who you are, and let what happens happen.  Either people will like the work, or they won’t.  As long as you like the work, you are doing the right thing.]]></description>
<author>Eric</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:13:22 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Dennis Keeley]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[I was able to meet him in Santa Fe and sit next to him in class for a week, his aura is the same as in his photographs. He gave us one of his photo stories as a movie about leaving the town he lived in, and the places that held memories...  it gave me chills<br />
 I enjoyed him, his stories and work...<br />
<br />
have a look<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.denniskeeley.com">www.denniskeeley.com</a>]]></description>
<author>Nicole</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:26:27 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Atlanta Celebrates Photography]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[One of the best thing about living in Atlanta is an event that happens year round (ACP now)... and in the fall Atlanta Celebrates Photography. This week I got to see Gregory Heisler speak on Arnold Newman's work, Danny Lyon show his pictures and speak about them, see a show on a photographer who was in a recent Whitney biennial, and put my work up at Piedmont park, go to Composition Gallery to see Sylvia Plachy's work, the see a public art instillation piece inside the water tower at Studioplex... that's where I have been the last 4 days.... Go explore!<br /><br />
<a href="http://www.acpinfo.org" target="_blank">Atlanta Celebrates Photography website</a>]]></description>
<author>Nicole</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:12:56 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[So, cropping makes a new format?]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[It's SQUARE! for only $299 you too can have this cute little camera. I think it's more like a pretty camera phone, sold as shooting WYSIWYG.... what you see is what you get... I cant see making a portrait with it, unless it's on the sly. I guess you could put it on your key-chain and it would look like a toy... maybe a good camera for little people, kids when they are learning. Although I loved my twin lens reflex cameras, this one is facade. The top lens doesn't do anything, just there to look pretty with no function, yeah I know, it's digital. So 3 mp,  to focus between 4 inches (10cm) to infinity, and its 1.1" LCD display allows for both Waist Level Shooting(?) how... oh for if you putting the camera on the ground, and you don't want to get on the ground... and the ability to review your images. On B & H's website they also list it as a fashion accessory under features. It does have a crank to "advance" to the next shot... which was always fun. Even though it seems a bit silly I wouldn't mind it ending up under my tree at Christmas.<a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/multiple_images/item_images/IMG_21756.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.bhphotovideo.com" alt="B&H Photo" width="" height="" border="" align="left" style="padding:px"/></a><br />]]></description>
<author>Nicole</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:57:01 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Are the Big Boys Coming?]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[There has been much speculation about what Nikon will do in the near future. After rocking the DSLR world with the release of their ISO performing D3 and D700 Canon responded with the very impressive 5D replacement. Leica made huge inroads into the realm of fine art digital photography with it's larger than full frame 37mp DSLR. So this speculation about what Nikon may do is this: something called the MX format. The labeling makes sense due to the DX and FX format tagging, so what's this MX format? The rumors have been wide ranging from Micro format to Medium format. There has been rumors all over the web about a Nikon medium format-lite rangefinder or some sort of modular body much like the standard medium format bodies such as Contax, Mamiya, Rollei, and Hasselblad, just to name a few. <br />
<br />
The most interesting rumor, and I hope it's correct, is a Nikon camera body much like the new Leica S2 but with a square sensor. Imagine Nikon, or any other 35mm DSLR, being the first manufacturer to produce a square sensor! The speculation is a sensor that measures 36mmx36mm or 48mmx48mm and I feel this would be great.<br />
<br />
The past six to eight months has proven to have been an exciting time in digital photography, I just hope the next year shakes out to be just as exciting! All of the competition is beneficial to all of us by bringing new technologies to market and lowering the costs to the consumer and the professional alike.<br />
<br />
Happy Shooting!]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:22:58 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Here they come!]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[Sony has released it's a900, 24mp DSLR. Though the lower ISO image samples look okay, anything over 200 ISO is rather useless. Hassleblad released it's 50mp back for the H3 series and then Phase One dropped it's 60mp back on us. Nikon's flurry of releases had stunned everyone and then Canon announced the 5D replacement with the 5D Mk II, which looks just as stunning as Nikon's D3 at high ISOs but with nearly twice the resolution. What else could happen? How about Leica dropping the S2 37mp camera with a sensor between 35mm and medium format size. No sample images yet on the Leica but they claim better high ISO image quality than Hasselblad. It's all getting very interesting and the proces are dropping like rocks.<br />
<br />
My suggestion with all of this news? Wait. I'm in the market for a new DSLR and I'm leaning to a certain one, but I want to wait to see what the landscape looks like in 12 months.<br />
<br />
Happy Shooting!]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:46:12 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[New things around the bend!]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[I know we've been a bit quiet over the past month or so, and with good reason. There are some new and exciting additions to the site we've been working on and look forward to rolling out to everyone. Wat we will be offering is a place for you to have your very own photo blog, hosted here for free. What we are really excited about is creating a place for those interested in having a place to share their thoughts, ideas, tips, and opinions in an environment that is surrounded by like minded people. Sure you could easily have your blog hosted by any of the many hosting services, the difference here will be there will be other bloggers within the same framework and within a community we like to call, photoboxr. In addition to this exciting news there will be some additions to the front page blogging staff. We will soon introduce special blog posts from another photography student, a fine art photographer and professor and a photojournalist and professor. With these exciting new additions to the site we look forward to building a community of photography minded people. From the amateur to the pro and everywhere in between we want to help people cultivate their ideas and talent and skills.<br />
<br />
Happy Shooting!]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:48:06 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Gregory Crewdson]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[Gregory Crewdson puts a tremendous amount of work and planning into each of his highly sought after images. Working with a crew of more than 40 people and with the aid of local authorities and citizens, Crewdson gets a level of access needed to have every detail accomplished.  Crewdson tells stories in his pictures, but not too much of the story for it to be all telling, that would be boring.  By adding stressful, sometimes disturbing, or unresolved elements to his photographs Crewdson creates a situation where capturing a viewer for a longer visit with his images.
A very important element in all pictures is something that grabs the viewer and makes them ask questions, at least in the world of fine art.  Art should make us think and should challenge us while maintaining a level of excellence and skill.  Making a photograph is easy, anyone can do it these days, but making a picture that tells just enough about a story where many different people can have many differing interpretations of what the story means, that’s something altogether different.
<br /><br /><a href="http://www.vam.ac.uk/collections/photography/past_exhns/twilight/crewdson/index.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.vam.ac.uk/images/image/29132-large.jpg" alt="Gregory Crewdson Image" width="200" height="140" border="" align="left" style="padding:px"/></a>

The level of detail in Crewdson’s images is nearly flawless. I would say the amount of detail is flawless, however, there are a few things that may be viewed or perceived as flawless, depending on the individual viewer.  Take the image from the Twilight series, above; Upon an initial look there are details included that, frankly, many would not have thought of including, such as, the lights inside the second house are on and there is visible detail. The addition of a light in the back right of the image by the tree helps to add some interest and serves to keep the image from going too dark on one side.  This light adds a nice balance to the image.  There are some things, however, I find a bit off in this image but I do not believe there is a alternate solution to these.  Take the lighting from right to left that is shining on the back of the woman in her underwear, the lady with the groceries, the front of the car and the ground in front of the car, and the woman in the car.  The lighting, for me, seems like stadium lighting. It’s a bit too strong from that angle to have shadows coming in the opposite direction from the car, groceries,  and the two women.  One can see there is a shadow cast from left to right by the bag of groceries on the hood of the car, however, there is no shadow cast from the bag on the ground. I suppose if the goal was to make the image seem as though it was an event happening under a few sodium vapor lights on poles those kinds of shadows might happen, but I find it a bit off.  It seems odd to me that with this level of detail, Crewdson would like these shadows.  But then again, he might be doing this on purpose and I find that possibility interesting.  Looking at the image and mentally removing the shadows takes away from the image as does mentally moving the light cast to match where the shadows are falling.  Knowing that Crewdson had his images worked up in Photoshop to ensure the best possible exposures for the sky and subject matter I feel the lighting should be a bit different. But hey, I’m not selling $100K prints either. <br /><br />

<a href="http://www.jpgmag.com/photos/208160" target="_blank"><img src="http://photos.jpgmag.com/208160_56214_d971c2c249_p.jpg" alt="Gregory Crewdson's $1M photoshoot" width="200" height="133" border="" align="left" style="padding:px"/></a>
The amount of preparation and work during these shots is tremendous.  Take the above image for example.  Upon first glance this image seems like any, “normal,” snapshot.  I suppose anyone could get lucky and get this same image, but it would be a luck shot.  Crewdson takes that and make it in such a way where the image can be recreated, in other words he makes lucky shots a common occurrence for himself.  The person lucky enough to have gotten an image like this would have had to be at that exact location with all the elements in the correct place and the fog, wet streets, and proper exposures for all the lights, Crewdson creates this with preparation.  The amount of preparation for these, “everyday,” image is immense.  Nailing down each individual detail from organizing the lighting crew to arranging the fire department to come and wet the streets down to removing unwanted elements, like street signs is a tremendous task for an image like this.  What I find compelling and repelling about this image is relativity, how everyday it is.  That’s the simplicity of it, everyone can relate having seen, in person, a scene like this. This image is as I would have remembered this scene if I had been there in everyday life.  As people we tend to romanticize our memories and a peaceful and calm evening like the one depicted in this image would be the way I’d romanticize the memory.  It’s as though Crewdson makes his outdoor images in reverse.  He takes a scene or location and thinks of a scenario then creates the image from what would be a future memory of the scenario.  With his use of lighting Crewdson remakes that memory with a cinematic feel, matching lights exactly where one would expect streetlights and reflections from wet pavement.
<br /><br />
<a href="http://www.vam.ac.uk/collections/photography/past_exhns/twilight/crewdson/index.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.vam.ac.uk/images/image/29134-large.jpg" alt="Gregory Crewdson image from "Twilight"" width="200" height="120" border="" align="left" style="padding:px"/></a>
This image is one my favorite Gregory Crewdson images, even with some lighting I’m not too fond of.  The light in the front left on the ground make absolutely no sense to me and I find it rather distracting.  And though I do not like that light there, I do.  I get the feeling that Crewdson is taking some lighting elements and placing them in positions that are irritating, distracting, and against some rules to really say, “hey this is my idea,” in a defiant way.  I like that, he’s a little rebellious at times and though I may or may not like what he did, I enjoy the rebellion.  The most noticeable element, of course, is the magnificent beam of light coming from the sky and into the bushes, right on the third I might add.  This beam element really makes this image say something to the viewer, it is an element that will stop someone and makes the potential viewer look longer at the image. In the end that is what photography is all about, getting someone to stop and really look at the image.  There has to be something within an image that is compelling, gripping, something that says, “hey look at me!”  This untitled image from Crewdson’s Twilight series does this expertly.  Once again Crewdson takes elements of the ordinary and puts a twist on it.  In other images he make the image look like a romanticized memory in cinematic form or he creates interest with interesting subject matter.  This image is no different.  By adding that single beam of light, Crewdson makes the viewer stop and think about why that beam is there, where is it coming from?  These are good questions to be asked when making image.<br />
<br />
Gregory Crewdson has taken the ordinary, the everyday, and given them a breath of air into his images.  By manipulating light and other elements of the scenes one can easily see the high level of importance he places on atmosphere.  Using his nuanced ambiance Crewdson then places his subject matter elements to tell a story.  What I find enlightening is he doesn’t tell the whole story, that is the beauty of the whole thing.  Crewdson give us just enough to go on and by pointing us in a particular direction with the images, more nudging than pointing, he leaves the rest of the story up to us to interpret.  Art is supposed to make the viewer think, to fill our inquisitive minds with fuel of the imagination.  If Crewdson told the entire story we’d be looking at commercial work instead of art.  His images are not a pack of gum or a car where everything is spelled out for the viewer to say, “I get it,” and that would resonate with millions of viewers.  Crewdson’s images, rather, suggest a story and with a million viewers there very well could be a million different conclusions about the story, what it means, how it started, and where it will end.  So, with an open mind and a further investigation of Gregory Crewdson’s pictures, the viewer can really gain a respect for what he is trying to accomplish in his images.]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:02:37 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Hasselblad HD3II-50]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[In the <b><a href="http://photoboxr.com/archived_blogs_by_title.php?date_time=1214323086747" target="_blank">Going Medium Format?</a></b> post I talked briefly about the $9000 price drop bringing to price of a 31mp Medium Format camera down to just under $18,000. With a price drop like that is there any surprise that Hasselblad had something new up their sleeves? Not really. So here it is, the HD3II-50. <br /><br /> *Uses new Kodak 50 megapixel sensor, measuring 36×48mm, twice the physical size of the largest 35mm DSLR sensors
    *  300 MB files <br />
    *  More creative freedom when cropping and altering <br />
    *  Incredible enlargement potential<br />
    *  Less moiré<br />
    *  1 fps capture rate thanks to 4-channel read-out structure<br />
    *  ISO 50 to ISO 400<br />
    *  ISO 800 with Hasselblad’s Phocus software<br />
    *  Full access to all Hasselblad lenses<br /><br />
No word yet on pricing but you can bet it's gonna be up there! 50, a nice round number. I wonder if this sensor is sharper than the image their lenses can muster, like with the 39mp.<br />
<br />
Happy Shooting]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:58:28 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[What's it like being a Photography Student?]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[For those of you who are not photo students you may not know what it's like. I go to the Art Institute of Atlanta and I love it. Here's a brief background: I worked for General Motors for 7 years and took a buyout. I used that money to go back to school to follow a dream. So, the first thing one ought to know about being a photography student is the expense. It's crazy. Here in Atlanta, Georgia we have only one processing lab that can successfully work with E6 chemistry and slide film. At school we do an aweful lot of film work, though we don't process it there anymore. we can still do B&W if we know how or want. A roll of film, discount style, is still like $7 for 120 chrome. Then it's another $8 to process it. so when you have 8 assignments over a ten week quarter with a minimun of 3 rolls per assignment you are looking at $360 minimun, above tuition, in film and processing. Everything has to be matted as well, more cost. If you are looking to be a photography student and the school you are looking at still does film prepare yourself for $1000 over tuition for each photo shooting class. Medium Format Polaroid is sill about $30 for 20 exposures but large format Polaroid (4x5) has ballooned to over $100 a box (20 exposures B&W) because Polaroid has stopped production of instant films.<br />
<br />
The class structure is fairly easy to figure out. Basics, intermediate, graduation portfolio. At some point it is vital that a photo student begin assisting professional photographers. This is just as important as going to school. By assisting you'll get to learn things you'll never learn in school, like how to work with an Art Director with a bad attitude. Also you'll learn a bunch of different equipment from cameras, to flash power packs, to lights. You'll learn how to shoot big things in tight places and still get good lighting. You'll be in the studio doing product work with an Art Director, a Food Stylist, and anyone else involved with the image. You'll work with make-up artists, models, hair stylists, product stylists, and other assistants. You'll be on location with mobile lights. You'll learn what a butt plug really is. In other words, ASSIST!<br />
<br />
Back in your classes it is important that once you know what you are doing with something to go and help someone that is struggling. Your fellow students are sometimes you best lifeline. Bounce ideas off of other students and instructors. Being in school is your time to get all those exposure problems and composition issues out of your system. Use this time to spend hours and hours watching Photoshop tutorials and practicing. Learn how to profile and print correctly from digital RAW files. Live in your Digital Darkroom or Lab.<br />
<br />
Okay, here are my tips for success in photography school. First off you need to know there really aren't that many really successful photographers in the world. For every Helmut Newton and David Lachapelle there are tens of thousands of broke photographers. About 2% of photo students become full time professional photographers with a client list that can pay the bills. So with that in mind, and don't let it discourage you from chasing after your dream, here are the tips.<br />
1. Show up first and leave last for your classes.<br />
2. Work harder than everyone else at school<br />
3. Eat, breath, and live: ad loaded magazines, photo journals like Grafis, International Archive, etc., go to tons of photo websites<br />
4. Get a firm grasp on graphic design<br />
5. Stop putting your images on Flickr<br />
6. Be honest in critiques with others and yourself<br />
7. NO EXCUSES!<br /> 
8. KNOW your ISO, Aperture, and Shutter speed scales<br />
<b>Be the one that is always prepared. Have tons of extra gear. A client doesn't care if your battery is dead, nor will you instructors care what difficulties you had. If you are always the one that has everything you need and then some you will also be the one that always seems to get the job done!</b><br />
<br />
If you are all those things you will be successful in photography school. You simply have to want it more than everyone else, you have to love the hard work. Everyone there is gunning to be better than everyone else. If you are not the best you can possibly be you will not get the best jobs you could possibly get. It's really tough but it can be done. I believe every single person has the ability to be brilliant at something. So go out there, follow your dream to do what you love to do, make pictures!<br />
<br />
To see what I have done in school go to <a href="http://gregnoblin.com" target="_blank">gregnoblin.com</a> And as always! <br />
Happy Shooting!]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:29:30 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[RED cameras]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[RED is a company that may change the way we think about studio photography, both stills and video. RED has three cameras either out or coming out. The <a href="http://www.red.com/cameras" target="_blank">4K RED ONE</a> is available now. Imagine a Canon 5D at 30 frames per seconds. Having video resolution much higher than the typical 2.1mp HD CCD sensors at a really low price would be, and is, great. RED is about to release several more cameras in 2009. The <a href="http://www.red.com/nab/scarlet" target="_blank">RED 3K Scarlet</a> is one piece of hardware, almost a dream machine. An ultra high definition video camera that shoots 12mp stills. All for under $3,000! Here are the specs: <br />
<br />
    *  NEW 2/3" MYSTERIUM X SENSOR<br />
    * 1-120 FPS (180FPS BURST)<br />
    * UP TO 100 MB/SEC REDCODE RAW AND RGB RECORDING TO  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;DUAL COMPACT FLASH<br />
    * 4.8" LCD<br />
    * 8X T2.8 RED ZOOM LENS<br />
    * FULL AUTO OR FULL MANUAL SHOOTING MODES<br />
    * HDMI and HD-SDI<br />
    * FIREWIRE 800 and USB2<br />
    * STILL MODE<br />
    * COMPATIBLE WITH MANY RED ONE ACCESSORIES<br />
    * WI-FI CONTROL<br /> <br />
The thing about this camera is not so much about what it offers but, rather, what it could mean for photography. With this camera, or one made like a DSLR that performs like it, would be fantastic for photojournalists. Who knows where this will lead, right now it seems to me that it'll make many DIY podcasters very very happy. I'll keep my eyes on this one to see if any of the technology comes out of these cameras.<br />
<br />
Happy Shooting!]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:12:31 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[ISO]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[What is ISO? How do you use ISO? Well, ISO stands for International Standards Organization. And the starndards set by the ISO for film give a numerical value to the sensitivity to light to film or sensor is. ISO is sometimes also called ASA. <br />
<br />
Here's the ISO Scale: 25 50 100 200 400 800 1600 3200 6400 12,800 25,600<br />
<br />
Each ISO <i>stop</i> represents sensitivity to light by a magnitude of 2. So, just like Aperture, ISO changes the amount of light recorded of a DSLR sensor or that is seen by film. The only difference is to change ISO settings with film you have to physically change film but with a digital camera you only need to change the setting. The difference between ISO 100 and ISO 200 is that ISO 100 is sensitive to half as much light as ISO 200. ISO 200 would be twice as sensitive to light as ISO100. There is a trade off though, higher ISO films produce a grainier image where the DSLR will make noiser images at higher ISO settings.<br />
<br />
Changing your ISO will allow you to make exposure changes without having to compromise compsitional elements by having to change aperture that could cause you to lose focus on the areas you want in focus and without having to change shutter speeds that may keep you from capturing the action of your shots. By changing the ISO you get to keep you composition the same but alter the exposure. This allows you to either increase or decrease the amount of light reaching the sensor.<br />
<br />
Happy Shooting!]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 07:56:49 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[July 4th shooting tips]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[Happy 4th of July! As today is a day where many of us will be outside with our families there will be many photo opportunities. There are a few things to know when shooting outside that will make life a whole lot easier. The first rule is the <b>Sunny Bright</b> rule, otherwise known as the Sunny 16 rule. Here's the rule: On a sunny day, between the times of 10am and 4pm, it's a sure bet to nail the exposure all you have to do is set your camera at 1/125th sec shutter @ ƒ16. Many people now have DSLRs and knowing this rule will make life really easy. If you are dealing with partly cloudy situations, depending on how much the clouds block the sun, you may have to stop down to ƒ11. A good way to prepare for a day like today is to possibly set your camera to shutter priority. This will keep the camera at a fixed shutter speed, I recommend 1/125th sec., while allowing the camera's light meter to adjust the aperture for the proper exposures. This will really make life a lot easier for those taking pictures outside but under tents and things like that. The fast shutter speed will allow for you to freeze the action while adjusting the aperture will allow for proper exposures under the varying lighting conditions. Secondly, I would leave your camera's white balance set to daylight. Don't bother with that Cloudy or Shade setting. Just know that when you are shooting with a daylight white balance setting things in shaded areas tend to go a bit cool, or blue. <br />
<br />
Photographing fireworks is a little different. You camera settings will need to change from the daylight conditions from earlier in the day. My suggestion to shooting fireworks would be to leave the shutter speed around 1/125th sec. to freeze the action of the show. Use the aperture setting, and I suggest going manual for this, to alter your exposures. You're going to have to do some fiddling to nail down the exposure but I would say to start wide open, like ƒ1.4 if you can, at the lowest ƒ-stop you can get with your lens. If you are using a zoom lens then your probably looking at ƒ3.5 on the widest angle to ƒ4.5 on the longest range of the lens. Since you will be far enough away from the fireworks your depth of field will be deep enough with a low aperture. I would not recommend setting the camera to Aperture Priority at this time, as the camera will shoot at such a slow shutter speed the fireworks will blur. So I suggest shooting: 1/125th sec.-1/60th @ ƒ3.5-4.5 Take a lot of pictures and pick the best ones later.<br />
<br />
Happy 4th and Happy Shooting]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:06:29 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Aperture Basics]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[Learning to use you equipment is the first basic fundamental to creating quality photographs. One of the most confusing technical things to learn when using a camera is the aperture scale. If you do Wiki search on Aperture you'll find something that's really technical and difficult to understand. <br />
<br />
So let's take it slow. First thing is to think in reverse. The lower the aperture number (f-stop) the bigger the opening (aperture). The thing to remember is that the wider the opening (aperture) the less you'll have in focus (depth of field). So in lower light situations you'll want to shoot with a wider aperture (smaller number) to let more light onto the film/sensor plane. The sacrifice is less depth of field (less of the image that is in focus in front and behind what you are focused on). Everything in photography has a trade off. <br /><br />
<b>The Aperture Scale:</b> ƒ: 1, 1.4, 2, 2.8, 4, 8, 11, 16, 22, 32, 45, 64, 90, 128<br />
<br />
What do the ƒ numbers actually mean? It's all math. The ƒ number is equal to the focal length of the lens divided by the iris diameter. <br/><br/>So remember, the higher the ƒ-stop, the more everything will be in focus but the less light you'll get because of the smaller opening (aperture).

It is also worth mentioning that each stop has a light difference of 2, meaning that if you change your setting from, say, ƒ5.6 to ƒ4 you are effectively letting in twice as much light. If you go the other way, say, ƒ4 to ƒ5.6 then are are letting in half the light you were from the ƒ4 setting.<br />
<br />
Happy shooting!]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:33:56 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[liveBooks|edu]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[As many of you know, I'm a BFA photography student at the Art Institute of Atlanta. I use a product called liveBooks to show my work. As having a professional website by graduation is a requirement I decided to go with liveBooks. The product is fantastic! You get a professional site for a fraction of the cost, if you are a student or educator. My site, <a href="http://gregnoblin.com" target="_blank">gregnoblin.com</a>  is my liveBooks|edu site. I love this product and will continue using liveBooks well into my professionanl career. For those of you looking to have a website like <a href="http://gregnoblin.com" target="_blank">gregnoblin.com</a> and you are a teacher or student that needs a website that is user friendly and built for the image based professional, <a href="http://livebooks.com/packages/edu/index.php" target="_blank">liveBooks|edu</a> is for you. If you use promo code <b>11791</b> you will get a free trial month. The yearly cost for students and educators is only $99 a year. You will not find a better looking, more user friendly web application to show off you work, skill, and talent that will help draw in clients and fans! So, again, <a href="http://livebooks.com/packages/edu/index.php" target="_blank">liveBooks|edu</a> is the best web tool for visual students to have a great looking web presence! And don't forget to use promo code <b>11791</b> to get your free month trial!]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:41:12 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[New Nikon Camera and Speedlite]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[As midnight struck across timezones around the world the corresponding websites updated with news of a Nikon SB-900 Speedlite and a new camera, the D700. Rumors had spread about a D90 or a D3x but those rumors proved to be not true. The Nikon D700 has a 12.1 mega-pixel FULL FRAME sensor with the EXPEED image processor, it looks as this camera will have the same noise handling capabilities as the D3, some suggest the D3 at ISO 1600 looks like a Canon 5D at ISO200. So it seems as though Nikon has released their 2nd FF camera, the rumored 5D killer. The sensor in the D700 has a self cleaning feature as well. For full details get this <a href="http://photoboxr.com/blog_files/D700.pdf" target="_blank">Nikon D700 pdf</a> or go to <a href="http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/Product/Digital-SLR/25444/D700.html" target="_blank">Nikon's official site</a>. <a href="http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/Product/Flashes/4807/SB-900-AF-Speedlight.html" target="_blank">The SB-900 speedlite</a> is there as well.]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:35:20 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Getting The Shot!]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[I've often heard the, "quality, not quantity," argument in photography. I know I shoot many less frames when using film than I do when I'm shooting digitally. Some believe that digital has taken the art, or skill, out of the craft because anyone can run out and snap several houndred images on their DSLR and get a couple of good ones. My goal, as a photographer, is to get the job done, no matter what. If it take a lot of film or a 500 frames from the DSLR, so be it. In the end it's all about results. A client does not care if you got the image on the 3rd frame or on the 200th. With the advent and increasing quality of the digital sensors art directors and clients now have more of a luxury of a bunch of looks or angles from the same shoot on the same day. Many times they can make the call about which image will be used that same day, if they are the only ones making that call. The key to being a successful photographer is, in many ways, like being a successful musician. You HAVE to know all the fundamentals and they have to be ingrained into your head. If you are fighting with exposure issues it will get in the way of you being creative. Knowing your equipment inside and out should be an absolute and should be on auto-pilot. <br />
Weather you are there to make the client happy or to capture a fantastic vacation photo that all of your friends will be impressed with, knowing the basics are key. Learn those basics and then go out, have fun, and make some great images! &nbsp; Happy shooting!]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:58:06 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Going Medium Format?]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[There has long been a push to get professional and high level amateurs to go MF. The main players in this have been Mamiya and Hasselblad. Mamiya has a killer camera in the <a href="http://www.calumetphoto.com/item/MA03031/" target="_blank">Mamiya 645 AFDII</a> going for $3000 (less if you are a student) and the option of getting a digital back for under $7000. This was the first camera to come along where we began seeing a price drop. For less the $1000 more than the original cost of the old Canon 1DsMkII someone could have a complete medium format digital rig.<br />
<br />
Contax stopped making it's 645 camera (that's 6cm x 4.5cm 120 film) a while ago. The <a href="http://jcohenphoto.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=92" target="_blank">Contax 645AF</a> is relatively cheap. You'll find them all over the place with a lens, viewer, and film back for under $1700. The thing about the Contax 645AF is it can utilize many different digital backs from the old Kodak Dcs PRO Backs and Mamiya ZD backs all the way to the Leaf and Phase One backs. This give shooters a 14MP to 39MP range in resolution. Another great thing about the Contax 645AF is the Zeiss lenses, they are super sharp.<br />
<br />
So, in walks Hasselblad, the Big Daddy of the Medium Format world. They revolutionized digital MF when they released the H series. They are currently at the H3DII model and, let me tell you, they are EXPENSIVE! Not many people could conceive of buying a $35,000 camera, but some can and here's why. Imagine you are a top pro shooter that routinely shoots $10,000 in film a month. This is not that difficult considering a roll of 120/220 goes for $8 and it's another $8 to get it processed. Get the digital MF and you've just cut $10,000 out of your monthly expenses, and you've paid for the camera in 4 months. Here's the big news, Hasselblad has just dropped the price of the H3DII-31 (31 mega-pixels) $9000! I know, still out of the range of the average shooter but a Hasselblad at $17,995 shows the direction digital is going. The <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/522925-REG/Hasselblad_70380550_H3DII_31_SLR_Digital_Camera.html" target="_blank">Hasselblad H3DII-31</a> is an awesome camera proving that one day everyone will have super high resolution cameras at an affordable price. Happy dreaming!]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:13:39 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Low Key Portrait]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[Low key portraits are my favorite kind of portrait. When shooting in this style the photographer can get creative with lighting and create a moody image that captures the essence of the serious side of the subject. Pushing yourself to play with some lighting can get you into another level taking pictures. You'll need a basic understanding of ƒ-stops and metering to do this set up. I've drawn up a diagram ( <a href="http://photoboxr.com/blog_files/low_key_diagram.jpg" target="_blank">jpg</a> or <a href="http://photoboxr.com/blog_files/low_key_diagram.pdf" target="_blank">pdf</a> ) on how to do a basic low key set up. You do not have to have all the studio equipment to get an awesome low key portrait, you can do it with the simplest of lights, even natural lighting or tungsten lights, but remember to check the white balance when using tungsten lights. <a href="http://www.gregnoblin.com/#a=0&at=0&mi=2&pt=1&pi=10000&s=15&p=1" target="_blank">Example low-key portrait.</a>]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:47:57 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[The Future of Photography]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[So I’ve been thinking about the future of the DSLR. I’ve been wondering about what the end game is, I mean, where does it end? As everything stands now, anyone with a <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=139&modelid=11933" target="_blank">Canon 5D</a> or a <a href="http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/Product/Digital-SLR/25434/D3.html" target="_blank">Nikon D3</a> easily have the quality and resolution to successfully shoot for any magazine ad. There are many things that require the use of a medium format digital back, but the photographer could easily rent that equipment. I’m not saying that 12 mega-pixel resolution on a full frame sensor is the be all and end all for advertising photography, not even close. Many clients demand higher resolution, but these cameras are capable of being successful in that arena.<br /><br /> 

We are getting very close to the point where 35mm DSLR bodies will have super low noise and high resolution. So what will the market landscape look like when everyone is running around with an $800 24MP Full Frame, 16Bit, 15fps, DSLR?  I suppose after the resolution ceiling has been effectively reached the manufacturers will throw in different features. Could you imagine having some sort of high-speed wireless connection in the camera? You could shoot your geo-tagged images straight into your FTP site. There will be <a href="http://www.pocketwizard.com/" target="_blank">Pocket Wizard</a> capabilities integrated into the cameras as well, a new selling point. Yet in the end and after all the fancy features the consumer market will be eventually end up flat. For the past few years camera manufacturers have had the luxury of creating the, “I need more this or that,” and people went out and bought more mega-pixels, bigger sensors, more frames per second, etc.<br /><br /> 

So in the future I don’t believe it will be much different than in the 70s, 80s, or most of the 90s. In those years everyone could have a nice 35mm SLR and many people had good quality film cameras, but not everyone was a pro. I get the feeling from the professionals out there that there will be tons and tons of people out there who believe they are just as good. That wasn’t the case in the days of film and I suspect it won’t be the case in the digital realm either.  There will still be a separation between the casual, amateur, and pro shooters.]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:41:50 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Canon Rebel XSi]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[So today Canon released the <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=139&modelid=16303" target="_blank">Rebel XSi</a> to add to it ever growing line of Rebel bodies. The 12.2 megapixel features Live View and the newer DIGIC III Image Processor. All for $799.99. It looks as though Canon is successfully getting back into where Nikon has been so successful the past couple of years, the consumer market. I'm a Nikon user, because I've been invested in the system from my first film camera, and I think Nikon is going to have to step it up. Nikon is too secretive about their direction. However true or not this is, we are about to hit the ceiling on resolution and what is really needed in both the consumer or pro markets. More on the future of the DSLR next time.]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 06:17:33 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[The Last Harvest]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.perrydilbeck.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.perrydilbeck.com/images/book.png" alt="The Last Harvest" width="125" height="149" border="0" align="left" style="padding:0px"/></a> The Last Harvest offers an inside look at the lives of Truck Farmers of the South. Truck Farmers generally work small parcels of land and this way of life is disappearing at an alarming rate. <a href="http://www.perrydilbeck.com" target="_blank">Perry Dilbeck</a> captures these forgotten people with respect and sense of nostalgia. As Perry grew up in rural Georgia he saw these farmers slowly disappear due to the urbanization of Atlanta and to the inability of the men and their small farms to compete with the large commercial farms that seemingly rule the day.<br />
   In "The Last Harvest," <a href="http://www.perrydilbeck.com" target="_blank">Perry Dilbeck</a> explores the lives of the men who worked these small farms by themselves. Perry's approach to the subject is expertly done with a romantic sense that points to the days when life was more simplistic and straight forward. With the use of the simplest of materials, the plastic Holga camera, <a href="http://www.perrydilbeck.com" target="_blank">Perry</a> captures this way of life in a most honest fashion. His dedication to this project reveals an important part of our history and his life.<br />
    <a href="http://www.perrydilbeck.com" target="_blank">"The Last Harvest"</a> is a work complete in beauty, history, and dedication. Be sure to check out his website and pick up <a href="http://www.perrydilbeck.com" target="_blank">"The Last Harvest"</a> at Barnes and Noble and Borders and other fine booksellers. Perry lives South of Atlanta, Georgia and is a Professor of Photography at The Art Institute of Atlanta.]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 16:59:48 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Cameras - THEY'RE JUST A LIGHT TRAP PEOPLE! A Guide to Buying]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[Look, I've heard all of those people arguing over what camera is better than the others. This battle primarily rages between Nikon and Canon shooters. The fact remains that a camera body is just a box that keeps light away from the film plane. This is why homemade pinhole cameras are just as effective at making quality images as, say, a Hasselblad, or at least a Holga. So what's the deal about digital? First of all, one of the first things to consider when buying a Prosumer or Pro DSLR body is to understand that you are buying into that company's system of accessories and lenses. Traditionally there are key things to look at when going after a new 35mm DSLR: 1. Your price point. When you know what you are willing to spend then you can go after the best quality 2. Lens quality (I don't care how great the sensor in the camera is, a $10 lens will give you a $10 image). 3. What other accessories, ie. off camera flash, are there, what is the quality and the price of those items? 4. Resolution. Know the difference between the quality of a "X" megapixel point and shoot versus the same resolution of a much larger DSLR sensor.

I recommend doing as much homework as possible on the brand you are leaning towards. Canon traditionally has better sensors, Nikon has better lenses with less distortions. So in the past one had to deal with a better, less noisy sensor with not quite a good glass, or having great glass and terrible sensors. As the technology continues to progress this will be less and less a factor. Happy camera hunting.]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 21:30:25 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[A New Body]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[So I am definitely in the market for a new camera body. I've had this battle going on in my head for quite some time as to the direction I'd like to go. Since I'll be done with my undergrad at the beginning of 2010 I do have some time left before I have to shell out some serious dollars. My dilemma has been which route to go, 35mm DSLR or Medium Format. I really wanted to get a Mamiya 645 AFDII with an eventual digital back. Then as I spoke with some of my instructors, it seems the 35mm DSLR offers the best versatility post grad. All magazine spots and anything else in that arena can easily be handled with a 35mm DSLR and I can always rent a MF system if the client so desires. So the format dilemma is over. Now, since I'm invested in the Nikon system I don't want to, "make the switch," to Canon, (I have absolutely nothing against Canon, or the users of them). It's just that I've bought into one system and to have to buy new speedlites and accessories would be too much right out of the gate from school. So I'm left needing a good body with low noise (My D200 is seriously noisy in deep shadows and at any ISO/ASA other than 100 or MAYBE 200). I keep hearing, well reading, rumors of a D3x body especially after Sony released news of their 24.4MP full frame sensor (Sony provides Nikon with it's sensors). I've read all the rave reviews of the great low light and noise reduction capabilities the D3 has, but I want higher resolution. So I have questions I need answered about a camera body that, as yet, does not exist. I suppose that since I won't have to go it alone for another year and a half I have the luxury of waiting to find out. But it does seem the camera wars are ramping up again after Nikon finally got with the program and made a FF body, and seemingly fixed their noise issues, at least in one body. The future me reveal many surprises, we shall see.]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

<item>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 21:07:02 -0700</pubDate>
<title><![CDATA[Shooting on the Ocoee River]]></title>
<link>http://photoboxr.com</link>
<description><![CDATA[So today I was up in Tennessee photographing Craig Heflin, a kayak instructor, paddling down the Ocoee River. I found a nice spot on the side by some of the rapids. As I waited for Craig to come around the bend a lady with, who I assume, her son set up to photograph him in the rapids. She pulled out her big canon, it was in the 1D family to be certain, and the accompanying big white lens. I had my Nikon D200 with a measly $450 (at the time of purchase) lens. I'm a Nikon shooter primarily because that's the first real camera I ever got, before I knew anything. What struck me as odd is how she kept fooling around with her polarizing filter? I was using one but after it's set to darken the sky you're pretty much set, unless you decide to shoot vertically or upside down. I just wanted to say, "HEY, why are you spending more time fooling with your filter than you are shooting?" I really got the sense that she cared more about all the attention she was getting from the other people with their P&S cameras and their admiration of her huge camera.<br />
<br />
So then Craig came around the corner, saw me perched on a rock, held up his paddle, and with a few hand gestures between us he knew exactly where to go in the rapids. He went in, I shot about 40 frames and then he put up beside me in the water. We discussed what was next. I climbed out of my position and I was off, done!]]></description>
<author>Greg</author>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
